다음에 대한 결과:
Hi,
I am trying to use an esp32 board with quectal ec200u LTE Modem to send sensor data to thingspeak. The board can process the sensor data however I am unable to send the data to thingspeak. I have used the same process earlier too however with a different modem from Simcom.
Can someone help me with specific commands for achieving this? I can share the code which i am trying to use.
Regards
Aditya
Good morning everyone. I’m having a problem with ThingSpeak. I’m sending data from an ESP LoRa with the RTC set to the Brasília time zone (GMT-3).
Previously, when I exported the data to CSV, it used the ThingSpeak time, which appeared 3 hours ahead. Now that I’m sending the timestamp from the ESP, the graphs are showing the data 3 hours behind. Is there a way to align the graph times while keeping the Brazilian time zone?
I have been a loyal MATLAB user for 25 years, starting from my university days. While many of my peers migrated to Python, I stayed for the stability, compatibility, and clean environment. However, I am finding the 2025 version exceptionally laggy. Despite running it on an $10k high-end machine, simple tasks like viewing variables and plotting take up to 60 seconds - actions that were near instantaneous in the 2020 version. I want to stay continue with MATLAB, but this performance gap is a major hurdle and irritation. I hope these optimization issues can be addressed quickly.
Missed the Cody World Cup Watch Party on March 27—or want to relive the glory?
What you’ll see in the video:
🔥 Top MATLAB users in action
Watch expert solvers think, debug, strategize—and occasionally panic.
Which functions do they reach for? How do they break down the problem?
BEHOLD the power moves… and the 3D arrays.
🏆 Three teams. Six champions. One viciously clever problem.
There may have been NaN traps.
There may have been nested for‑loops.
There may have been… emotions.
🎙️ Professional‑grade commentary by:
@Matt Tearle – Architect of Diabolical Challenges
Their line‑by‑line play‑by‑play turns MATLAB into a true spectator sport.
Finally, tell us what you want to see next—head‑to‑head contests? Team battles? Drop your ideas in the comments. All suggestions welcome!
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE... make MATLAB Copilot available as an option with a home license.
Please change the documentation window (https://www.mathworks.com/help/index.html) so I don't have to first click a magnifying glass before I can to get to a text field to enter my search term.
This is a reminder that the Cody World Cup Watch Party takes place on March 27 at 10:00 AM ET.
We’ll watch how top MATLAB minds solve a fun‑but‑challenging Cody championship‑round problem, followed by a live open discussion with the players.
📅 To join, download the ics calendar file (link updated and no sign‑in required) or copy the meeting link and add it to your calendar!
Dear all,
Recently I started working on a VS Code-style integrated terminal for the MATLAB IDE.
The terminal is installed as an app and runs inside a docked figure. You can launch the terminal by clicking on the app icon, running the command integratedTerminal or via keyboard shortcut.
It's possible to change the shell which is used. For example, I can set the shell path to C://Git//bin//bash.exe and use Git Bash on Windows. You can also change the theme. You can run multiple terminals.
I hope you like it and any feedback will be much appreciated. As soon as it's stable enough I can release it as a toolbox.
You’re invited to the Cody World Cup Watch Party! Six of the world’s best MATLAB users have advanced to the Cody Contest 2025 Bonus Round to tackle a championship-level Cody problem. Now it’s your chance to watch, learn, and interact with those pros!
📅When & How to Join
Date: March 27, 2026
Time: 10:00 AM Eastern Time
Where: Microsoft Teams (download the ics calendar file or copy the meeting link and add it to your calendar!)
📽 Agenda
Part 1 – Watch Together (25 min)
Watch how those top MATLAB users think, debug, strategize, and occasionally panic😅. Enjoy professional-grade commentary from MathWorks experts as the action unfolds.
Part 2 – Live Discussion (35 min)
Chat directly with those top minds and the problem creator, @Matt Tearle! Reply in the comments with questions you’d like us to ask them.
🧩 Solve the Problem Yourself!
For the best experience, try that Cody problem yourself before the event. Trust us — the discussions are way more fun after you’ve wrestled with it.
Whether you are a beginner or a seasoned expert, this is your chance to see the best in action, pick up MATLAB tips, and have some fun. See you there!
I was reading Yann Debray's recent post on automating documentation with agentic AI and ended up spending more time than expected in the comments section. Not because of the comments themselves, but because of something small I noticed while trying to write one. There is no writing assistance of any kind before you post. You type, you submit, and whatever you wrote is live.
For a lot of people that is fine. But MATLAB Central has users from all over the world, and I have seen questions on MATLAB Answers where the technical reasoning is clearly correct but the phrasing makes it hard to follow. The person knew exactly what they meant. The platform just did not help them say it clearly.
I want to share a few ideas around this. They are not fully formed proposals but I think the direction is worth discussing, especially given how much AI tooling MathWorks has built recently.
What the platform has today
When you write a post in Discussions or an answer in MATLAB Answers, the editor gives you basic formatting options. Code blocks, some text styling, that is mostly it. The AI Chat Playground exists as a separate tool, and MATLAB Copilot landed in R2025a for the desktop. But none of that is inside the editor where people actually write community content.
Four things are missing that I think would make a real difference.
Grammar and clarity checking before you post
Not a forced rewrite. Just an optional Check My Draft button that highlights unclear sentences or anything that might trip a reader up. The user reviews it, decides what to change, then posts.
What makes this different from plugging in Grammarly is that a general-purpose tool does not know that readtable is a MATLAB function. It does not know that NaN, inf, or linspace are not errors. A MATLAB-aware checker could flag things that generic tools miss, like someone writing readTable instead of readtable in a solution post.
The llms-with-matlab package already exists on GitHub. Something like this could be built on top of it with a prompt that includes MATLAB function vocabulary as context. That is not a large lift given what is already there.
Translation support
MATLAB Central already has a Japanese-language Discussions channel. That tells you something about the community. The platform is global but most of the technical content is in English, and there is a real gap there.
Two options that would help without being intrusive:
- Write in your language, click Translate, review the English version, then post. The user is still responsible for what goes live.
- A per-post Translate button so readers can view content in a language they are more comfortable with, without changing what is stored on the platform.
A student who has the right answer to a MATLAB Answers question might not post it because they are not confident writing in English. Translation support changes that. The community gets the answer and the contributor gets the credit.
In-editor code suggestions
When someone writes a solution post they usually write the code somewhere else, test it, copy it, paste it, and format it manually. An in-editor assistant that generates a starting scaffold from a plain-text description would cut that loop down.
The key word is scaffold, not a finished answer. The label should say something like AI-generated draft, verify before posting so it is clear the person writing is still accountable. MATLAB Copilot already does something close to this inside the desktop editor. Bringing a lighter version of it into the community editor feels like a natural extension of what already exists.
A note on feasibility
These ideas are not asking for something from scratch. MathWorks already has llms-with-matlab, the MCP Core Server, and MATLAB Copilot as infrastructure. Grammar checking and translation are well-solved problems at the API level. The MATLAB-specific vocabulary awareness is the part worth investing in. None of it should be on by default. All of it should be opt-in and clearly labeled when it runs.
One more thing: diagrams in posts
Right now the only way to include a diagram in a post is to make it externally and upload an image. A lightweight drag-and-drop diagram tool inside the editor would let people show a process or structure quickly without leaving the platform. Nothing complex, just boxes and arrows. For technical explanations it is often faster to draw than to write three paragraphs.
What I am curious about
I am a Data Science student at CU Boulder and an active MATLAB user. These ideas came up while using the platform, not from a product roadmap. I do not know what is already being discussed internally at MathWorks, so it is entirely possible some of this is in progress.
Has anyone else run into the same friction points when writing on MATLAB Central? And for anyone at MathWorks who works on the community platform, is the editor something that gets investment alongside the product tools?
Happy to hear where I am wrong on the feasibility side too.
AI assisted with grammar and framing. All ideas and editorial decisions are my own.
I coded this app to solve the 20 or so test cases included with the Cody problem 'visually' and step-by-step. For extra fun, it can also be used to play the game... Any comments or suggestions welcome!
Hello All,
This is my first post here so I hope its in the right place,
I have built myself a GW consisting of a RAK2245 concentrator and a Raspberry Pi, Also an Arduino end device from this link https://tum-gis-sensor-nodes.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dragino_lora_arduino_shield/README.html
Both projects work fine and connect to TTN whereby packets of data from the end device can be seen in the TTN console.
I now want to create a Webhook in TTN for Thingspeak which would hopefull allow me to see Temperature , Humidity etc in graphical form.
My question, does thingspeak support homebuilt devices or is it focused on comercially built devices ?
I have spent many hours trying to find data hosting site that is comepletely free for a few devices and not to complicated to setup as some seem to be a nightmare. Thanks for any support .
How can I found my license I'd and password, so please provide me my id
Currently, the open-source MATLAB Community is accessed via the desktop web interface, and the experience on mobile devices is not very good—especially switching between sections like Discussion, FEX, Answers, and Cody is awkward. Having a dedicated app would make using the community much more convenient on phones.
Similarty,github has Mobile APP, It's convient for me.
Is it possible to display a variable value within the ThingSpeak plot area?
I struggle with animations. I often want a simple scrollable animation and wind up having to export to some external viewer in some supported format. The new Live Script automation of animations fails and sabotages other methods and it is not well documented so even AIs are clueless how to resolve issues. Often an animation works natively but not with MATLAB Online. Animation of results seems to me rather basic and should be easier!
Frequently, I find myself doing things like the following,
xyz=rand(100,3);
XYZ=num2cell(xyz,1);
scatter3(XYZ{:,1:3})
But num2cell is time-consuming, not to mention that requiring it means extra lines of code. Is there any reason not to enable this syntax,
scatter3(xyz{:,1:3})
so that I one doesn't have to go through num2cell? Here, I adopt the rule that only dimensions that are not ':' will be comma-expanded.
In the sequence of previous suggestion in Meta Cody comment for the 'My Problems' page, I also suggest to add a red alert for new comments in 'My Groups' page.
Thank you in advance.
I’m currently developing a multi-platform viewer using Flutter to eliminate the hassle of manual channel setup. Instead of adding IDs one by one, the app uses your User API Key to automatically discover and list all your ThingSpeak channels instantly.
Key Highlights (Work in Progress):
- Automatic Sync: All your channels appear in seconds.
- Multi-platform: Built for Web, Android, Windows, and Linux.
- Privacy-Focused: Secure local storage for your API keys.
(Requested for newer MATLAB releases (e.g. R2026B), MATLAB Parallel Processing toolbox.)
Lower precision array types have been gaining more popularity over the years for deep learning. The current lowest precision built-in array type offered by MATLAB are 8-bit precision arrays, e.g. int8 and uint8. A good thing is that these 8-bit array types do have gpuArray support, meaning that one is able to design GPU MEX codes that take in these 8-bit arrays and reinterpret them bit-wise as other 8-bit array types, e.g. FP8, which is especially common array type used in modern day deep learning applications. I myself have used this to develop forward pass operations with 8-bit precision that are around twice as fast as 16-bit operations and with output arrays that still agree well with 16-bit outputs (measured with high cosine similarity). So the 8-bit support that MATLAB offers is already quite sufficient.
Recently, 4-bit precision array types have been shown also capable of being very useful in deep learning. These array types can be processed with Tensor Cores of more modern GPUs, such as NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture. However, MATLAB does not yet have a built-in 4-bit precision array type.
Just like MATLAB has int8 and uint8, both also with gpuArray support, it would also be nice to have MATLAB have int4 and uint4, also with gpuArray support.
