atand(x) very much slower than atan(x)!?
조회 수: 2 (최근 30일)
이전 댓글 표시
Today I used atand(x) and atan(x). To my great surprise atand(x) was not just a little bit slower than atan(x) but is incredibly slow compared to atan(x)?
I tried to verify this by using the code below. First a time measurement for atan(x), than for atan(x) multiplied with 360/2/pi to go to degrees and finally one loop for atand(x). The results I found were:
Elapsed time is 0.047019 seconds. -> atan(x)
Elapsed time is 0.062016 seconds. -> atan(x)*360/2/pi
Elapsed time is 4.166911 seconds. -> atand(x)
And finally a test to check if atand(x) yielded identical results to atan(x) which was 'true' for all arguments tested.
This would mean that one should never use atan2d because atan2(x)*360/2/pi is much and much quicker? Why is there even a atan2d(x) function or why is it so slow?
Kind regards,
Ernst Jan Grift
clear all
n=1000000;
x_rad=zeros(1,n);
x_rad_to_d=zeros(1,n);
x_d=zeros(1,n);
arg=rand(1,n);
tic
for i=1:n
x_rad(i)=atan(arg(n));
end
toc
tic
for i=1:n
x_rad_to_d(i)=atan(arg(n))*360/2/pi;
end
toc
tic
for i=1:n
x_d(i)=atand(arg(n));
end
toc
same=x_rad_to_d==x_d;
all(same)
댓글 수: 0
채택된 답변
추가 답변 (1개)
Matt J
2013년 3월 28일
편집: Matt J
2013년 3월 28일
Your observation is interesting, but I don't think the conclusion is that you should never use ATAND, but only that it hasn't been well-optimized for the JIT yet, and shouldn't be used in for-loops. When vectorized, its performance is fine,
n=1e7;
arg=rand(1,n);
tic
x_rad=atan(arg);
toc
%Elapsed time is 0.106370 seconds.
tic
x_rad_to_d=atan(arg)*180/pi;
toc
%Elapsed time is 0.111417 seconds.
tic
x_d=atand(arg);
toc
%Elapsed time is 0.115595 seconds.
댓글 수: 0
참고 항목
카테고리
Help Center 및 File Exchange에서 Logical에 대해 자세히 알아보기
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!