Fzero returning wrong root

조회 수: 3 (최근 30일)
Emily Davenport
Emily Davenport 2020년 11월 19일
댓글: Emily Davenport 2020년 11월 19일
Hello,
I've tried everything I can think of to get the intersection point of these two curve, however, no matter which method I've used (interp1, fzero, min(abs(P-y)), ...) I get the wrong answer. I can tell because when I plot the curves with the found intersection point it is not the intersection. Can anyone tell what's going wrong for me? Much appreciated.
syms theta
% integrate Fr (no longer a function of r) w/r.t. theta;
% move constants out of integrand
g(theta) = (cos(theta))^(1/2)*(cos(theta/2))^9;
F_theta = vpaintegral(g,[-pi() pi()],'reltol', 1e-32, 'AbsTol', 0) % no closed form solution, numerically approximate
% plot P vs Ki
P = @(Ki) (real(1- exp(-Ki*F_theta)));
figure(1)
Ki_interval = [0 10];
fplot(P, Ki_interval, 'b'); title('Probability of Failure vs. Normalized SIF');
xlabel('Normalized Ki'); ylabel('Propability of Failure, P');
% Plot Zoomed in P vs. Ki to get an iniital guess for Ki such that P=0.95
figure(2)
fplot(P, Ki_interval, 'b');
xlim([1 3]); ylim([0.75,1]);
hold on
fplot(0.95, Ki_interval, 'r') % graph P=0.95
title('Zoomed in Probability of Failure vs. Normalized SIF');
xlabel('Normalized Ki'); ylabel('Propability of Failure, P');
hold on
Ki_guess = 2;
%y = @(Ki) (0.95);
fun = @(Ki) ((real(1- exp(-Ki*F_theta)))-0.95);
% fplot(fun, Ki_interval,'k')
% hold on
% fplot(0, Ki_interval, 'g')
intersection_point = fzero(fun, Ki_guess)
% graph intersection point to check
scatter(intersection_point,0.95,'or','filled')
hold off

채택된 답변

David Goodmanson
David Goodmanson 2020년 11월 19일
편집: David Goodmanson 2020년 11월 19일
Hello Emily
If you insert this
F_theta = double(F_theta);
just after the calculation of F_theta, you will get the correct result. The natural domain of fzero is doubles, and mixing in vpa caused problems.
I would be remiss if I did not mention that the entire calculation does not have the right feel. You are creating a cdf, which is a real function. Perhaps the calculation is correct and the imaginary part was intentional. But the vast majority of the time doing a calculation that unexpectedly gives a complex result, then just taking the real part and moving on, is incorrect. Is it possible that the integral for F_theta should be from -pi/2 to pi/2?
  댓글 수: 1
Emily Davenport
Emily Davenport 2020년 11월 19일
Thank you! I did not know I needed the double type for F_theta. Also, yes you are indeed correct I had the wrong bounds! I appreciate your help.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

추가 답변 (0개)

카테고리

Help CenterFile Exchange에서 Optimization에 대해 자세히 알아보기

태그

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by