I have a function that uses 9 inputs (cts(1) to cts (9)) and provides 1 value as result. The function needs 4 parameters (c(1) to c(4)). The code of the function is:
fun = @(c,cts) ((c(1) .* (4-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 4)) *cts(1,:) +...
((c(1) .* (5-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 5)) *cts(2,:)+ ...
((c(1) .* (6-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 6)) *cts(3,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (7-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 7)) *cts(4,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (8-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 8)) *cts(5,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (9-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 9)) *cts(6,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (10-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 10)) *cts(7,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (11-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 11)) *cts(8,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (12-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 12)) *cts(9,:)
I have 11 measured values with each 9 inputs. From this data set I want to fit the parameters c. A condition that applies for only the first row of the input is that
((c(1) .* (4-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 4)) *cts(1,1) must be greater than ((c(1) .* (5-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 5)) *cts(2,1). Is there an algorithm which can do that? I already tried lsqcurvefit without this constraint, but the fitted parameters do not follow the condition.
Thank you for your time.

 채택된 답변

Matt J
Matt J 2019년 12월 12일
편집: Matt J 2019년 12월 12일

0 개 추천

You would have to use fmincon, which will let you specify non-linear constraints.

댓글 수: 3

Marco Knobloch
Marco Knobloch 2019년 12월 13일
편집: Marco Knobloch 2019년 12월 13일
I tried to use fmincon, but I realized that I have to pass parameters from the optimization to my non linear constraint and it is not obvious to me how I can pass them. In detail, I have my function and inputs from above. The objective to minimize and the constraints function:
fun = @(c) ((c(1) .* (4-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 4)) *cts(1,:) +...
((c(1) .* (5-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 5)) *cts(2,:)+ ...
((c(1) .* (6-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 6)) *cts(3,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (7-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 7)) *cts(4,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (8-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 8)) *cts(5,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (9-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 9)) *cts(6,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (10-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 10)) *cts(7,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (11-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 11)) *cts(8,:) + ...
((c(1) .* (12-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 12)) *cts(9,:)
objective = @(c) sum(((fun(c)-y) ./ y).^2); % To minimize
The constraint is that the first term (c(1) .* (4-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 4)) *cts(1,1) must be greater than the second term (c(1) .* (5-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 5)) *cts(2,1), but only in the first row.
function [a, ceq] = nonlcon(m,c,cts)
a = (c(1) .* (5-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 5)) *cts(2,1) - ...
(c(1) .* (4-c(4))) ./ (c(2)+c(3) .* 4)) *cts(1,1) ;
ceq= [];
end
The fmincon line looks like this
A_opt = fmincon(objective,[1 1 1 1],[],[],[],[],[],[],@(c,cts)nonlcon(m,c,cts)
Obviously there is an error because I gave fmincon not enough input arguments. But the additional input arguments c are the parameters which fmincon should fit. Is there a way to pass nonlcon the current values of the optimization for the parameters?
Matt J
Matt J 2019년 12월 13일
편집: Matt J 2019년 12월 13일
Obviously there is an error because I gave fmincon not enough input arguments.
It would be more obvious if you copy/pasted the exact error messages, but my guess is that this will fix it,
c_opt = fmincon(objective,[1 1 1 1],[],[],[],[],[],[],@(c)nonlcon(m,c,cts) )
Marco Knobloch
Marco Knobloch 2019년 12월 13일
That worked. Many thanks

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

추가 답변 (0개)

카테고리

도움말 센터File Exchange에서 Linear and Nonlinear Regression에 대해 자세히 알아보기

제품

릴리스

R2019b

질문:

2019년 12월 12일

댓글:

2019년 12월 13일

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by