Given a matrix "A", how to create a row vector of 1s that has the same number of elements as "A" has rows?
조회 수: 315 (최근 30일)
이전 댓글 표시
Given a matrix "A", do the following things:
- Create a row vector of 1's that has the same number of elements as "A" has rows.
- Create a column vector of 1's that has the same number of elements as "A" has columns.
- Using matrix multiplication, assign the product of the row vector, the matrix "A", and the column vector (in this order) to the variable "result".
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
채택된 답변
Manali Gupta
2024년 10월 21일
편집: MathWorks Support Team
2024년 10월 21일
Given a matrix "A", you can find the number of rows of A by using "size(A,1)". You can find the number of columns of "A" by using "size(A,2)". You can then use "ones" to create a row or column vector of 1's. Finally, use the "mtimes" or * operator to perform matrix multiplication.
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
row_vector = ones(1,size(A,1));
column_vector = ones(size(A,2),1);
result = row_vector*A*column_vector;
For more information about learning the basics of MATLAB®, see MATLAB Onramp.
댓글 수: 4
Mariam Aldeepa
2021년 1월 2일
Why when you calculate the result multiplied the matrix "A" with another two matrices ?
추가 답변 (11개)
Alex Mcaulley
2019년 6월 4일
I think the goal of this forum is not to do anyone's homework, but to solve generic questions about Matlab that can help more users. This exercise is very simple, anyone who has ever used Matlab could do it, so, I think the best thing we can do is help @Gaurav to know how to learn the basics of Matlab.
댓글 수: 2
Carlo Romagnolo
2021년 4월 19일
Hi! I know this might be a long a shot, as this thread has been inactive for quite some time, but I was wondering if you could help me with a general question on this.
Here is my code to solve this problem:
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
format compact
row = [1,1,1,1]
column = [1;1;1;1;1]
result = row * A * column
I was wondering if there is a better/more elegant way to answer the question which does not involve hardcoding the row and column vectors but instead uses functions.
Khom Raj Thapa Magar
2020년 8월 28일
편집: DGM
2023년 2월 21일
% Given
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
row_vec = ones(1,size(A,1))
column_vec = ones(length(A),1)
result = row_vec * A * column_vec
댓글 수: 1
Sudhanshu Rasal
2020년 5월 5일
편집: DGM
2023년 2월 21일
Simple way to do this question is
X=[1 1 1 1]
Y=[1;1;1;1;1]
result=X*A*Y
????????
댓글 수: 3
DGM
2023년 2월 21일
편집: DGM
2023년 2월 21일
The point of writing a program is to have the computer do the work. Literally writing out the vectors manually makes as much sense as calculating the inner product on paper and writing
result = 210; % this is my entire program
Both examples will fail for obvious reasons if the size of A changes.
Tushar Parmar
2020년 5월 11일
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20]
B(1:4)=1;
f=B*A
C(1:5)=1;
C=C'
result=f*C
댓글 수: 6
DGM
2023년 2월 21일
The point of writing a program is to have the computer do the work. Use size() to find the size of A; use ones() to generate the vectors programmatically.
Arakala Gautham
2020년 4월 4일
R_vector = ones(1,size(A,1));
C_vector=ones(size(A,2),1);
result = R_vector*A*C_vector;
댓글 수: 5
Abhishek
2023년 7월 2일
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
R = (A(:,1))';
R(:)=1;
C = (A(1,:))';
C(:)=1;
result = R*A*C
%@DGM bro is this code ookay?
Rishabh Nirala
2020년 5월 20일
편집: DGM
2023년 2월 21일
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
C = [1;1;1;1;1]
R = [1 1 1 1 ]
P = R * A
result = P*C
ANSWER = 210
댓글 수: 1
DGM
2023년 2월 21일
Again, the point of writing a program is to have the computer do the work. Use size() to find the size of A; use ones() to generate the vectors programmatically.
Sneham Shrikant Vaidya
2020년 5월 27일
편집: DGM
2023년 2월 21일
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
A
x = [1 1 1 1 ]
y = [1;1;1;1;1]
z = A*y
result =x*z
you can also perform this way as we know z =(lxm)*(mxn) so we first multiply A*y as their inner dimension ara same
then we obtain result matrix z that has inner dimension equal to x so now we can multiply x*z to get final ans
댓글 수: 1
DGM
2023년 2월 21일
Use size() to find the size of A; use ones() to generate the vectors programmatically. Otherwise, this fails if the size of A changes.
Adding explanations to your answers is good though.
VISHWA D
2020년 6월 22일
A = [1:5; 6:10; 11:15; 16:20];
row_vector=[1 1 1 1 1]
col_vector=[1; 1; 1; 1]
result=(row_vector*(A'))*(col_vector)
댓글 수: 2
lijuan wang
2020년 8월 27일
I thought the assignment has a wrong requirement, right?
we should create a vector which has the some rows as A. So it should be row_vector=[1 1 1 1]'?
DGM
2023년 2월 21일
편집: DGM
2023년 2월 21일
@lijuan wang is correct. This answer creates the vectors incorrectly. Not only are they created manually in a way that would break if the size of A changes, they do not correspond to the specified dimensions of A. The result is correct, but the vectors are wrong, and the method is poor practice.
Chintan
2023년 2월 21일
row_vector=ones(size(A(:,1)))'
coloumn_vector=ones(size(A(1,:)))'
result=row_vector*A*coloumn_vector
댓글 수: 1
DGM
2023년 2월 21일
I suppose that's one way, but size() supports dimension specification, which would avoid the need to address vectors of A or to transpose anything.
Also note that the ctranspose, ' operator is the complex conjugate transpose. If you just want to reorient a vector or matrix, use transpose, .' instead.
Waseem Zafar
2023년 9월 17일
편집: Waseem Zafar
2023년 9월 17일
A = [1:5; 6:10, 11:15; 16:20]
R = [1 1 1 1]
C = [1;1;1;1;1]
Z = A*C
result = R*Z
댓글 수: 1
DGM
2023년 9월 17일
This example is identical to at least two other bad examples in this thread, differing only in the variable names.
You are told to use the size of A to construct two vectors. This example, and at least four others define the vectors literally instead of programmatically creating them as told. Let me be clear. You literally wrote two of the intermediate results into the script instead of making your script calculate them. If I were grading this, I would accept it no more than if you had just written
result = 210;
... because it neglects the entire point of the exercise to presuppose the input and bake the results into the script as literals.
An answer can earn its place if it demonstrates something either good or bad, but there is no value in duplicate, unformatted, unexplained answers with obvious, openly-discussed flaws. It doesn't add anything to the discussion and only serves to confuse readers who are looking for help.
Is there always room left in a thread for another answer that's not a near-duplicate? No. Sometimes it's not. Is this question completely exhausted? Not sure, but with extremely simple direct questions, it doesn't take long. If you want to answer questions, pick a thread where there is still room for a new answer.
참고 항목
카테고리
Help Center 및 File Exchange에서 Creating and Concatenating Matrices에 대해 자세히 알아보기
제품
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!