Problem computing inverse Laplace transform of the Bessel function

조회 수: 16 (최근 30일)
Kevin B
Kevin B 2017년 11월 11일
답변: BeeTiaw 2020년 8월 5일
I am trying to evaluate the inverse Laplace transform of a function that includes the modified Bessel function of the second kind, i.e., my function is f_s = sqrt(a*s)*besselk(1,2*sqrt(a*s)), where a is a constant (say a = 0.5) and 's' is defined as a symbol. To evaluate the inverse Laplace transform of this function, I used the built-in Matlab function 'ilaplace' as transV = ilaplace(f_s,s,t), where I want to evaluate my function at 't' = 2. However, the problem I am getting is that the inverse transformed expression transV still contains 's' variable, which I supposed to transform to 't' after the inverse Laplace transform.
Can anyone help me with what is the problem with this approach? I checked the Matlab documentation and still couldn't figure out the solution. I already tried using 'vpa' function as it was suggested in one of the Matlab forums, but that didn't help to get rid of 's'. I am stuck with this and would really appreciate any help on it.
My code is
a = 0.5; t = 2;
syms s;
f_s = 1/s*sqrt(a*s)*besselk(1,2*sqrt(a*s));
transV = ilaplace(f_s,t); % or transV = vpa(ilaplace(f_s,t));
With this, the final result transV still has an expression which is a function of 's' although it should be transformed after ilaplace.
  댓글 수: 2
David Goodmanson
David Goodmanson 2017년 11월 11일
Hi Kevin,
It appears that the result is just a slightly different inverse laplace transform that the toolbox can't do either. Might not exist in closed form.
Kevin B
Kevin B 2017년 11월 11일
Hi David,
Thanks for your suggestion. Yes, the closed form solution seems not to exist. I tried Mathematica to check if it can help but without success. For me, the numerical solution is fine for now and I am not able to get that either. Do you have any further suggestions to get the numerical solution? Thanks a ton!

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

채택된 답변

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2017년 11월 11일
Maple says that for a > 0, the result is (1/2)*exp(-a/t)
  댓글 수: 3
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2017년 11월 11일
Under the assumption that a1, a2, a3, a4, s are all > 0, then
(1/2)*(BesselK(1, 2*a2^(1/2)*a3^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a3-a2)/t)*a2^(1/2)*a3^(1/2)+BesselK(1, 2*a1^(1/2)*a4^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a4-a1)/t)*a4^(1/2)*a1^(1/2)+BesselK(1, 2*a2^(1/2)*a4^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a4-a2)/t)*a4^(1/2)*a2^(1/2)+BesselK(1, 2*a1^(1/2)*a3^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a3-a1)/t)*a1^(1/2)*a3^(1/2))/t

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

추가 답변 (1개)

BeeTiaw
BeeTiaw 2020년 8월 5일

카테고리

Help CenterFile Exchange에서 Calculus에 대해 자세히 알아보기

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by