# Indexing via 3d array changed behaviour 2015a -> 2015b?

조회 수: 3 (최근 30일)
Sven 2015년 10월 15일
댓글: Scott French 2015년 10월 21일
Hi all, just got 2015b, here's a strange one where indexing via a multidimensional array has a differently shaped output to previous versions:
Code:
a = 1:10;
b = reshape(4:6,1,1,[]);
a(b)
2015a and before:
ans(:,:,1) =
4
ans(:,:,2) =
5
ans(:,:,3) =
6
2015b:
ans =
4 5 6
I searched through the release notes and couldn't find anything that relates to this behaviour change. Did I miss something? Or is this a bug that I should report?
##### 댓글 수: 1이전 댓글 -1개 표시이전 댓글 -1개 숨기기
David Young 2015년 10월 15일
I really hope someone answers this! It's very worrying that something as fundamental as array indexing might have quietly changed between versions. Of course the underlying problem is the inconsistent way indexing is applied to A(B) if both A and B are vectors. Since in this case isvector(b) returns 0, I think that the pre-2015b results are "correct", so to me it looks like a bug.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

### 채택된 답변

Scott French 2015년 10월 20일
This was an intentional change/bug fix. Prior to R2015b, there was an inconsistency in the MATLAB indexing behavior - if you try your experiment in R2015a, but with the value of "a" being stored in a field of a struct, or an element of a cell, you'd get a different answer:
>> s.a = 1:10
s =
a: [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10]
>> b=reshape(4:6, 1, 1, []);
>> s.a(b)
ans =
4 5 6
It didn't seem reasonable that the same value could be indexed by the same index, but give different results depending on where the value came from. So we changed it to give the same result.
The rule that we apply is, for an expression R(I) where R and I both have only one non-singleton dimension, then the dimensions of the result have the length of I, and the orientation of R.
Scott
##### 댓글 수: 5이전 댓글 3개 표시이전 댓글 3개 숨기기
Walter Roberson 2015년 10월 21일
Perhaps some kind of "strict vector orientation" setting could be added. Make it easy to use. Maybe put some detection into the code analyzer as a "best practice". Especially if you can add a convenient notation for "reshape this expression as a row vector" -- something easier than INDEXABLEEXPRESSION(:).' and something cleaner than reshape(NONINDEXABLEEXPRESSION,1,[]) . Maybe a ." operator?
Anyhow, do you have the facility for scoped pragmas? So someone could code
for K = 1 : 50 %#svo
... this code is under Strict Vector Orientation pragma
end
... the scope of %#svo ended
function myfunction %#svo
... entire function or subfunction is under %#svo
for K = 1 : 50 %#nosvo
... except this section
end
... we are back to %#svo
function mysubfunction
... subfunctions are scoped and so inherit %#svo or not
end
end
What would %#svo do, exactly? I'm not sure at the moment, but at the very least it would mean that assigning a vector of the wrong orientation to a vector slot would be detected as a shape error. Perhaps it should also mean that using the built-in routines that do automatic first-nonsingular dimension choice should be an error unless the dimension is explicitly provided. Maybe it should also mean Sven's Rule #2 should not be in effect.
One thing that needs to be distinguished is single index versus multiple index. R(I,J) should probably not depend upon the shape of I or J.
Hmmm... there is going to be a lot of code where a column vector is indexed by a row vector . Using R((I).') isn't so bad, but it would be nice if there was a column-vector form of P:Q without having to code (P:Q).'
Ramble.
Scott French 2015년 10월 21일
Ramble cheerfully accepted.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

### 카테고리

Help CenterFile Exchange에서 Matrix Indexing에 대해 자세히 알아보기

### Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by