필터 지우기
필터 지우기

adding all fields of a structures

조회 수: 5 (최근 30일)
Sonali
Sonali 2023년 11월 1일
편집: Matt J 2023년 11월 1일
I have a following structure with fields:
say, my_struct = struct with fields:
bin_1: [851×19 table]
bin_2: [868×19 table]
bin_3: [164×19 table]
bin_4: [104×19 table]
bin_5: [348×19 table]
bin_6: [406×19 table]
bin_7: [303×19 table]
bin_8: [323×19 table]
bin_9: [275×19 table]
bin_10: [110×19 table]
I want to have a structure with one field that is all field combined together. Something like my_new_struct= bin_1: [3500(approx.)×19 table]
i.e. my_new_struct= sum of all tables of my_struct
Could someone help me with the program for that?
  댓글 수: 1
Stephen23
Stephen23 2023년 11월 1일
This is fragile data design: as Voss correctly pointed out, the order of fields may not be the order you expect or require. The cause is because you have hidden meta-data (i.e. pseudo indices) in the fieldnames. Much better data design would use actual indices (rather then pseudo-indices) e.g. in a simple structure array or a cell array. That also significantly simplifies the code required to merge all of the tables:
vertcat(C{:}) % from a cell array
vertcat(S.F) % from a structure array
Better data design leads to much better code.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

답변 (3개)

Matt J
Matt J 2023년 11월 1일
편집: Matt J 2023년 11월 1일
Tables=arrayfun(@(f)mystruct.(f) ,"bin_"+(1:10) ,'uni',0);
my_new_struct.Bin=vertcat(Tables{:});
  댓글 수: 2
Dyuman Joshi
Dyuman Joshi 2023년 11월 1일
편집: Dyuman Joshi 2023년 11월 1일
Using fieldnames would be better imo.
Matt J
Matt J 2023년 11월 1일
편집: Matt J 2023년 11월 1일
If they are the only fields present, and in the order shown, then yes, fieldnames would probably be better.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.


Voss
Voss 2023년 11월 1일
Here's one way to do that:
% a structure like your "my_struct", but with only 3 fields:
my_struct = struct( ...
'bin_1',array2table(repmat("bin_1_data",2,2)), ...
'bin_2',array2table(repmat("bin_2_data",4,2)), ...
'bin_3',array2table(repmat("bin_3_data",3,2)))
my_struct = struct with fields:
bin_1: [2×2 table] bin_2: [4×2 table] bin_3: [3×2 table]
% combine all the tables:
C = structfun(@(x){x},my_struct);
T = vertcat(C{:})
T = 9×2 table
Var1 Var2 ____________ ____________ "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data"
However, that may not combine the tables in the order you wanted. In order to impose an order, you can do something like this:
% get the names of the fields:
fn = fieldnames(my_struct);
% reorder them somehow:
% fn = sort(fn); % sorted lexicographically
% fn = natsort(fn) % sorted by the number they contain
fn = fn(end:-1:1); % reverse
% combine all the tables in that order:
C = cellfun(@(f)my_struct.(f),fn,'UniformOutput',false);
T = vertcat(C{:})
T = 9×2 table
Var1 Var2 ____________ ____________ "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data"
See natsort in the File Exchange, which may give you the ordering you're after in this case.

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2023년 11월 1일
편집: Bruno Luong 2023년 11월 1일
s.bin_1=array2table(rand(2,3));
s.bin_2=array2table(rand(3,3));
s.bin_3=array2table(rand(4,3));
c=struct2cell(s);
newstruct.T = cat(1,c{:});
disp(newstruct.T)
Var1 Var2 Var3 _______ ________ _______ 0.90585 0.16903 0.21998 0.6887 0.44019 0.43033 0.3722 0.79743 0.50584 0.64057 0.40379 0.56822 0.14505 0.4095 0.27283 0.71969 0.053031 0.60168 0.67643 0.2598 0.83108 0.17963 0.71627 0.46944 0.77515 0.42908 0.429

카테고리

Help CenterFile Exchange에서 Structures에 대해 자세히 알아보기

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by