Hello everyone,
I have the generalized eigenvalue problem (K-w^2*M)*R = 0 where
K is a 6x6 diagonal matrix whose values are unknown,
M is a 6x6 matrix whose values are known,
w^2 are the eigenvalues (typically called lambda) and they are known through f ( w = 2*pi*f )
R are the eigenvectors
I would like to obtain the diagonal values of K that minimize the difference between f_exact (my values) and f_calc evaluated through iterations.
I tried with lsqnonlin but the f_calc is far from my f_exact.
Does anyone know how to optimize in a better way?
Here's my code:
% M matrix
M = diag([1e3, 1e3, 1e3, 1e5, 1e5, 1e5]);
M(1,4) = 100; M(4,1) = 100; M(1,5) = 150; M(5,1) = 150;
M(2,6) = 10; M(6,2) = 10; M(3,6) = 1; M(6,3) = 1;
M(2,3) = 30; M(3,2) = 30; M(3,5) = 500; M(5,3) = 500;
f_exact = [30, 30, 100, 10, 10, 20]; %lambda = (2*pi*f)^2
K_guess = [1e8, 1e8, 1e8, 1e8, 1e8, 1e8]; %Initial guess
LB = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1];
UB = [1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15];
options = optimoptions('lsqnonlin','FunctionTolerance',1e-16);
K_opt = lsqnonlin(@(K) obj_function(K, M, f_exact),K_guess,LB,UB,options);
%% Check
K_check = diag(K_opt);
[R,L] = eig(K_check,M);
f_calc = diag(sqrt(L)./(2*pi));
function diff = obj_function(K, M, f_exact)
K_mat = diag(K);
[R,L] = eig(K_mat,M);
eig_calc = diag(L);
f_calc = sqrt(eig_calc)./(2*pi)
diff = f_calc - f_exact;
end

댓글 수: 2

At least you should sort given and calculated eigenvalues before comparing them.
It's good to learn optimization with lqsnonlin. However, in this eigenvalue problem, the algorithm is kind of defeating the purpose because your objective function depends eig() computation itself.
Might as well use eig() directly to find the eigenvalues. You can use eig() for checking the accuracy, but not relying on it to solve the problem.
The logical question is how can the objective function be formulated without eig()?

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

 채택된 답변

Matt J
Matt J 2023년 8월 3일
편집: Matt J 2023년 8월 3일
% M matrix
M = diag([1e3, 1e3, 1e3, 1e5, 1e5, 1e5]);
M(1,4) = 100; M(4,1) = 100; M(1,5) = 150; M(5,1) = 150;
M(2,6) = 10; M(6,2) = 10; M(3,6) = 1; M(6,3) = 1;
M(2,3) = 30; M(3,2) = 30; M(3,5) = 500; M(5,3) = 500;
f_exact = [30, 30, 100, 10, 10, 20];
K_guess = ((2*pi*f_exact(:)).^2.*diag(M))'; %<---- better initial guess
LB = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1];
UB = [1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15];
options = optimoptions('lsqnonlin','FunctionTolerance',1e-16,'StepTol',1e-16, 'OptimalityTol',1e-12,'MaxFunEvals',inf);
[K_opt,~,res] = lsqnonlin(@(K) obj_function(K, M, f_exact),K_guess,LB,UB,options);
Local minimum possible. lsqnonlin stopped because the final change in the sum of squares relative to its initial value is less than the value of the function tolerance.
%% Check
K_check = diag(K_opt);
[R,L] = eig(K_check,M);
f_calc = diag(sqrt(L)./(2*pi)).';
sort(f_calc) %<---compare sorted
ans = 1×6
9.9997 10.0000 20.0000 30.0000 30.0000 100.0000
sort(f_exact)
ans = 1×6
10 10 20 30 30 100
function diff = obj_function(K, M, f_exact)
K_mat = diag(K);
[R,L] = eig(K_mat,M);
eig_calc = diag(L).'; %<---transpose
f_calc = sqrt(eig_calc)./(2*pi);
diff = sort(f_calc) - sort(f_exact); %<---compare sorted
end

댓글 수: 7

Thank you very much!
Marina
Marina 2024년 10월 21일
이동: Matt J 2024년 10월 21일
Hi,
Could you please let me know how to solve that for a non-diagonal K matrix?
where:
K = [k1 + k2, -k2, 0;
-k2, k2 + k3, -k3;
0, -k3, k3];
Just modify the way K_mat is constructed,
function diff = obj_function(k, M, f_exact)
k1=k(1); k2=k(2);
K_mat = [k1 + k2, -k2, 0;
-k2, k2 + k3, -k3;
0, -k3, k3];
[R,L] = eig(K_mat,M);
eig_calc = diag(L);
f_calc = sqrt(eig_calc)./(2*pi)
diff = f_calc - f_exact;
end
Marina
Marina 2024년 10월 22일
편집: Matt J 2024년 10월 22일
See my code below, I am getting f values very distant from my target f values. Do you know why?
% Given data
m1_kip_s2_ft = 1035;
m2_kip_s2_ft = 628;
m3_kip_s2_ft = 591;
M = diag([m1_kip_s2_ft, m2_kip_s2_ft, m3_kip_s2_ft]); % Mass matrix
T_wanted1_s = 5.2;
T_wanted2_s = 4.0;
T_wanted3_s = 1.17;
T_wanted_s = [T_wanted1_s; T_wanted2_s; T_wanted3_s]; % Target periods
f1_Hz = 1/T_wanted1_s;
f2_Hz = 1/T_wanted2_s;
f3_Hz = 1/T_wanted3_s;
f_exact_Hz = [f1_Hz, f2_Hz, f3_Hz];
% Initial Guess for Stiffness Matrix (Non-Diagonal Form)
k1_guess = ((2 * pi * f1_Hz)^2) * m1_kip_s2_ft;
k2_guess = ((2 * pi * f2_Hz)^2) * m2_kip_s2_ft;
k3_guess = ((2 * pi * f3_Hz)^2) * m3_kip_s2_ft;
% Combine into initial guess vector [k1, k2, k3]
K_guess_kip_ft = [k1_guess, k2_guess, k3_guess];
% Bounds for K
LB = [1, 1, 1];
UB = [1e20, 1e20, 1e20];
% LB = eps*[2, -1, 0;
% -1, 2, -1;
% 0, -1, 1];
%
% max_val = 1e15;
% UB = max_val*[2, -1, 0;
% -1, 2, -1;
% 0, -1, 1];
% Define bounds and flatten them for optimization (vectorize)
LB_vec = LB(:);
UB_vec = UB(:);
K_guess_vec = K_guess_kip_ft(:); % Vectorize the initial guess matrix
% Optimization options
options = optimoptions('lsqnonlin','FunctionTolerance',1e-16,'StepTol',1e-16, 'OptimalityTol',1e-12,'MaxFunEvals',inf);
% Perform optimization (objective function should accept vectorized K)
% [K_opt_vec,~,res] = lsqnonlin(@(K) obj_function_reshaped(K, M, f_exact_Hz), K_guess_vec, LB_vec, UB_vec, options);
[K_opt_vec,~,res] = lsqnonlin(@(K) obj_function_reshaped_matrix(K, M, f_exact_Hz), K_guess_vec, LB_vec, UB_vec, options);
K_opt = [K_opt_vec(1) + K_opt_vec(2), -K_opt_vec(2), 0;
-K_opt_vec(2), K_opt_vec(2) + K_opt_vec(3), -K_opt_vec(3);
0, -K_opt_vec(3), K_opt_vec(3)];
% Check the optimized stiffness matrix
disp('Optimized Stiffness Matrix (K):');
disp(K_opt);
% Solve eigenvalue problem with optimized K
[R, L] = eig(K_opt, M);
f_calc_Hz = (diag(sqrt(L) ./ (2 * pi)).'); % Do not sort to preserve order
T_calc_s = 1 ./ f_calc_Hz; % Periods as a row vector
%% Error
% Calculate the squared error between target and calculated periods
error_squared = (T_wanted_s - T_calc_s.').^2; %Transpose T_calc_s
% Display calculated periods and error
disp('Calculated periods (T_calc_s):');
disp(T_calc_s);
disp('Squared error between target and calculated periods:');
disp(error_squared);
%% Objective function definition for reshaped K
function diff = obj_function_reshaped_matrix(K_vec, M, f_exact)
k1 = K_vec(1);
k2 = K_vec(2);
k3 = K_vec(3);
% Reshape the vector back to a 3x3 matrix
K_mat = [k1 + k2, -k2, 0;
-k2, k2 + k3, -k3;
0, -k3, k3];
% Solve eigenvalue problem
[R, L] = eig(K_mat, M);
% Extract eigenvalues and calculate frequencies
eig_calc = diag(L).'; % Transpose to row vector
f_calc = sqrt(eig_calc) ./ (2 * pi);
% Return the difference between sorted calculated and exact frequencies
diff = (f_calc) - (f_exact);
end
Matt J
Matt J 2024년 10월 22일
No, I do not know why.
Marina
Marina 2024년 10월 22일
편집: Marina 2024년 10월 22일
Do you have any suggestion on how I can get my K stiffness matrix? with a better exact vs calculated values. Thank you!
Matt J
Matt J 2024년 10월 22일
I'm afraid not. I have no reason to believe it should work.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

추가 답변 (0개)

카테고리

도움말 센터File Exchange에서 Surrogate Optimization에 대해 자세히 알아보기

제품

릴리스

R2019b

질문:

2023년 8월 3일

댓글:

2024년 10월 22일

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by