Hi to anybody who could enlighten me
Matlab's arguments synthax is excelent for function's input validation and allow for very usuefull tip to the end user when using the function. However I found myself wondering if argument would replace inputParser in the future. I find inputParser to be way more flexible than arguments and would greatly miss such a functionality if it would ever get removed.
Technical context: for inputParser type functions, it is always possible to pass a struct as input to a Name-Value pair argument
function myFun(varargin)
p=inputParser;
p.addParameter('a',defaultValue,validationFunction)
p.addParameter('b',defaultValue,validationFunction)
p.StructExpand=true; % true by default
end
could be called in two ways
myFun('a',myValueForA,'b',myValueForB)
or
s.a=myValueForA
s.b=myValueForB
myFun(s)
I am an avid user of the 2nd method and found myself in trouble when I tried using this sythax with the Name-Value structure of the arguments.
To repeat again the question: Is there a way to expand struct input to a function accepting Name-Value type using the arguments validation structure in the same maner as inputParser?
Thanks in advance for your answers

 채택된 답변

Paul Villain
Paul Villain 2022년 10월 31일

0 개 추천

found my luck
this is not possible
Answer hier see also possible workaround from Walter Roberson

추가 답변 (0개)

카테고리

도움말 센터File Exchange에서 Argument Definitions에 대해 자세히 알아보기

질문:

2022년 10월 30일

답변:

2022년 10월 31일

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by