Non-linear constraints with several input variables in fmincon
조회 수: 1 (최근 30일)
이전 댓글 표시
Hello everyone,
I am trying to solve the following optimization problem with fmincon:
To do this, I have made the following code:
fun = @(x) x'*L*x;
nonlcon = @(x) consfun(A,B,x);
x = fmincon(fun,x0,[],[],[],[],[],[],nonlcon);
Where ''consfun'' is the following function:
function [c,ceq] = consfun(A,B,x)
c = (norm(A*x,inf)/b)-D);
ceq = [];
end
However, the final solution, x, does not satisfy the non-linear constraint so I wonder if the code is correct in relation to the optimisation problem posed.
Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much for your time!
댓글 수: 1
Alan Weiss
2021년 9월 20일
Did fmincon claim to give a feasible solution? If so, then in what way was the constraint violated? I mean, was consfun(A,B,x) > 0? If not, then you may need to search for a feasible solution. See Converged to an Infeasible Point.
Alan Weiss
MATLAB mathematical toolbox documentation
채택된 답변
Matt J
2021년 9월 20일
편집: Matt J
2021년 9월 20일
Your nonlinear constraints are not differentiable. That doesn't always spell disaster, but it breaks the assumptions of fmincon. Also, since your problem can be reformulated as a quadratic program, it would be better to use quadprog.
[m,n]=size(A);
e=ones(m,1);
Aineq=[A;-A];
bineq=[(B+b*D).*e ; -(B-b*D).*e];
x=quadprog(L,zeros(n,1),Aineq,bineq);
댓글 수: 4
Perry Mason
2021년 9월 22일
I meant that the constraint in the original problem of javm6 is defined in terms of the infinity norm.
I reckon your reformulation works if the constraint is defined using euclidean norm, but will this reformulation still work even if the infinity norm is used?
Cheers
추가 답변 (0개)
참고 항목
카테고리
Help Center 및 File Exchange에서 Surrogate Optimization에 대해 자세히 알아보기
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!