Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Click here to see

To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

Rolling-window analysis of a time-series model assesses:

The stability of the model over time. A common time-series model assumption is that the coefficients are constant with respect to time. Checking for instability amounts to examining whether the coefficients are time-invariant.

The forecast accuracy of the model.

Suppose that you have data for all periods in the sample. To check the stability of a time-series model using a rolling window:

Choose a rolling window size,

*m*, i.e., the number of consecutive observation per rolling window. The size of the rolling window will depend on the sample size,*T*, and periodicity of the data. In general, you can use a short rolling window size for data collected in short intervals, and a larger size for data collected in longer intervals. Longer rolling window sizes tend to yield smoother rolling window estimates than shorter sizes.Suppose that the number of increments between successive rolling windows is 1 period, then partition the entire data set into

*N*=*T*–*m*+ 1 subsamples. The first rolling window contains observations for period 1 through*m*, the second rolling window contains observations for period 2 through*m*+ 1, and so on.There are variations on the partitions, e.g., rather than roll one observation ahead, you can roll four observations for quarterly data.

Estimate the model using each rolling window subsamples.

Plot each estimate and point-wise confidence intervals (i.e., $$\widehat{\theta}\pm 2\left[\widehat{SE}\left(\widehat{\theta}\right)\right]$$) over the rolling window index to see how the estimate changes with time. You should expect a little fluctuation for each, but large fluctuations or trends indicate that the parameter might be time varying.

For more details on assessing the stability of a model using rolling window analysis, see [1].

Suppose that you have data for all periods in the sample. You can
*backtest* to check the predictive performance of several
time-series models using a rolling window. These steps outline how to
backtest.

Choose a rolling window size,

*m*, i.e., the number of consecutive observation per rolling window. The size of the rolling window depends on the sample size,*T*, and periodicity of the data. In general, you can use a short rolling window size for data collected in short intervals, and a larger size for data collected in longer intervals. Longer rolling window sizes tend to yield smoother rolling window estimates than shorter sizes.Choose a forecast horizon,

*h*. The forecast horizon depends on the application and periodicity of the data. The following illustrates how the rolling window partitions the data set.If the number of increments between successive rolling windows is 1 period, then partition the entire data set into

*N*=*T*–*m*+ 1 subsamples. The first rolling window contains observations for period 1 through*m*, the second rolling window contains observations for period 2 through*m*+ 1, and so on. The figure illustrates the partitions.There are variations on the partitions, e.g., rather than roll one observation ahead, you can roll four observations for quarterly data.

For each rolling window subsample:

Estimate each model.

Estimate

*h*-step-ahead forecasts.Compute the forecast errors for each forecast, that is $${e}_{nj}={y}_{m-h+n+j}-{\widehat{y}}_{nj}$$, where:

*e*is the forecast error of rolling window_{nj}*n*for the*j*-step-ahead forecast.*y*is the response.$${\widehat{y}}_{nj}$$ is the

*j*-step-ahead forecast of rolling window subsample*n*.

Compute the root forecast mean squared errors (RMSEs) using the forecast errors for each step-ahead forecast type. In other words,

$$RMS{E}_{j}=\sqrt{\frac{{\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{N}{e}_{nj}^{2}}}{n}}\text{for}j=1,\mathrm{...},h.$$

Compare the RMSEs among the models. The model with the lowest set of RMSEs has the best predictive performance.

For more details on backtesting, see [1].

[1] Zivot, E., and J. Wang. *Modeling Financial Time
Series with S_PLUS®*. 2nd ed. NY: Springer Science+Business
Media, Inc., 2006.