Problem 72. Interpolator

the question language must be improved -- flank it and all is absurd, i think

The wording on this was a little off, I had to review results to see what the aim was. But not difficult. Thanks for the challenge.

good job!

tricky

kind of pointless, since the function already exists

u cannot use 'mean',if not use 3.5,for instance 3.2 3.3
u should use interp1
my answer https://blog.csdn.net/qq_44846756/article/details/116567963

@arsenic, your comment on the main post is deleted because it revealed the answer. It is not the best practice to do so.

I couldn't remember interp1 but I formed a very silly code to do the same

hi Giorgio, can you provide an explanation for this? it seems really hard for me

varargin is the input variable which we can use to give multiple inputs to a function in matlab. So the inputs were (va,a,b) which here is
varargin{1} = va;
varargin{2} = a;
varargin{3} = b;

Absolutely for the tests...

For convenience, it would be useful if the code input variables were related to the variables listed in the solution window. We are given a, b, alpha, and beta in the Test Suite; the function that we are to type involves vb, va, a, and b. Sure, we can update it, but it just seems careless.

good

good

this won't work when the point is not in middle of 2 elements, for example a=3.3 in test 1