Problem 156. Parasitic numbers
Solution Stats
Problem Comments
-
5 Comments
might be best to add a test case to guard against test suite hacking
Far too few test cases. In fact, a serious issue with this problem is that there are too few parasitic numbers that will fit into even 64 bits for most values of n.
I've added some test cases, that will make it a bit more difficult to game this problem.
Cases 5 and 7 are identical, and I believe they are both wrong. 5 x 142857 = 714285. Isn't this a parasitic number? What am I missing?
Can the problem creator disqualify "solutions" that cheat? There should be a point penalty (-200) associated with cheating too.
Solution Comments
Show commentsProblem Recent Solvers277
Suggested Problems
-
2017 Solvers
-
1064 Solvers
-
1863 Solvers
-
Back to basics 17 - white space
268 Solvers
-
Relative ratio of "1" in binary number
1035 Solvers
More from this Author23
Problem Tags
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!