I think the answer to problem 7 should be [0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0], because q=31 leads to a Wagstaff prime.
Yes, you're right. Thanks, William. I've corrected the test suite. I should have known there was a problem because Athi's solution stepped around 31.
Math with Roman Numerals
Reverse the vector
Sum the Digits of a Number
Return 'on' or 'off'
Find the nearest prime
Solve the Challenger puzzle
Construct the Seidel-Entringer-Arnold triangle
Evaluate the zeta function for real arguments > 1
Determine digits of the Copeland-Erdos constant
Compute the nth Naerogahtyp emirp
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office