set xticks by calculation but also force 0 to be displayed

조회 수: 17(최근 30일)
Robert Demyanovich
Robert Demyanovich 2021년 6월 10일
댓글: Walter Roberson 2021년 6월 10일
I am setting xticks manually based on user inputs for distance. The plot will span the distance range; for example -1.3E-06 to 1.3E-06. The calculation works well to calculate the distance between tick marks, but depending on how it's done it may or may not automatically included 0 on the x axis. Is there a way I can force 0 to be displayed on the axis without altering my method for calculating the distance between tick marks.

채택된 답변

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2021년 6월 10일
format long g
%demonstration values
x = linspace(-1.4e-6,1.32e-6,29)
x = 1×29
-1.4e-06 -1.30285714285714e-06 -1.20571428571429e-06 -1.10857142857143e-06 -1.01142857142857e-06 -9.14285714285714e-07 -8.17142857142857e-07 -7.2e-07 -6.22857142857143e-07 -5.25714285714286e-07 -4.28571428571428e-07 -3.31428571428571e-07 -2.34285714285714e-07 -1.37142857142857e-07 -3.99999999999998e-08 5.71428571428574e-08 1.54285714285714e-07 2.51428571428572e-07 3.48571428571429e-07 4.45714285714286e-07 5.42857142857143e-07 6.4e-07 7.37142857142857e-07 8.34285714285715e-07 9.31428571428571e-07 1.02857142857143e-06 1.12571428571429e-06 1.22285714285714e-06 1.32e-06
y = sinpi(2e6*x)
y = 1×29
-0.587785252292474 -0.945356108439569 -0.961536119504149 -0.630482294044714 -0.0717461367613788 0.512899277405907 0.912324417231455 0.982287250728688 0.697522514745702 0.160865609613698 -0.433883739117559 -0.871947226253863 -0.995129582585911 -0.758946694294555 -0.248689887164854 0.351374824081344 0.824549628907141 0.999959716170871 0.814260281314378 0.334511859971844 -0.266036845566676 -0.770513242775789 -0.996738762088015 -0.863017923326349 -0.417640539972131 0.178556894798636 0.710273137068058 0.985492653565727 0.904827052466019
array_of_tick_values = -1.3e-6:.24e-6:1.3e-6
array_of_tick_values = 1×11
-1.3e-06 -1.06e-06 -8.2e-07 -5.8e-07 -3.4e-07 -1e-07 1.4e-07 3.8e-07 6.2e-07 8.6e-07 1.1e-06
%force a 0
xticks(union(array_of_tick_values, 0))
However, this could result in two ticks being close together. For example if your calculated tick was at -1e-10 then you would get a tick at -1e-10 and at 0. In the above example plot you can see that the -0.1 tick is close to the 0 tick
xtrange = max(abs(array_of_tick_values));
array_of_tick_values = linspace(-xtrange,xtrange,length(array_of_tick_values));
  댓글 수: 2
Robert Demyanovich
Robert Demyanovich 2021년 6월 10일
That is true. I tried your linspace solution and it didn't work. But the union solution did and that is good enough for me.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

추가 답변(1개)

Joel Lynch
Joel Lynch 2021년 6월 10일
편집: Joel Lynch 2021년 6월 10일
  댓글 수: 2
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2021년 6월 10일
ismember(0, vector_of_values)
but that leaves the searching open in that form. But if the vector is sorted you could
idx = find(vector_of_values <= 0, 1, 'last')
if vector_of_values(idx) == 0
exact match for 0
vector_of_values = [vector_of_values(1:idx), 0, vector_of_values(idx+1:end)]
assuming row vector
... But the union() approach I posted is much more compact and has the same effect.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.


Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by