, that is the sine is connected to y, and the cosine with x. Nothing wrong with your specification, just unusual. finding lengths of an ellipse
조회 수: 11 (최근 30일)
이전 댓글 표시
I have to find the lengths of an ellipse which is given by y = cost and x = 5 sint. Evaluate the length from t1=0 to the following points,
t2=[0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,4.5,5,5.5,6]. Have to use one of the methods, trapezoidal, midpoint or simpson's to two digit accuracy. How do i write a script from 0 to 0.5, 0 to 1, 0 to 1.5 etc ( from 0 to each point) to get 12 values for the lengths.
댓글 수: 2
David Wilson
2019년 4월 18일
See one of the many solutions, such as:
By the way, are you sure you have your parametric equation the right way around? It is typical to have it
, that is the sine is connected to y, and the cosine with x. Nothing wrong with your specification, just unusual.
, that is the sine is connected to y, and the cosine with x. Nothing wrong with your specification, just unusual. 채택된 답변
David Wilson
2019년 4월 18일
If you need a little more help, then it pays to plot the ellipse and look at the arc lengths.
t = linspace(0,2*pi)';
x = @(t) 5*sin(t); y = @(t) cos(t);
t2=[0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,4.5,5,5.5,6]';
plot(x(t),y(t),'r-', ...
x(0), y(0), 'bs', ...
x(t2), y(t2), 'kh');
for i=1:length(t2)
text(x(t2(i)), y(t2(i)),sprintf('%2.1f',t2(i)))
end
grid on; axis equal;
xlabel('x'); ylabel('y')

It's important to have the axis equal in order to roughly approximate the arc lengths. You can see that from t=0 to t=0.5, the arc length is a little over 2.5. That makes a good check.
Now I've used the formlar above for the arc length, but I've had to convert your sine to my cosine etc. I;'ve also used integral, your (homework?) requested you use a simpler Simpson etc, which I'll leave you to implement. At least you have a tentative solution.
>> f = @(t) sqrt(25*sin(pi/2-t).^2 + cos(pi/2-t).^2);
>> arcLengths = arrayfun(@(t2) integral(f,0,t2), t2)
arcLengths =
2.4014
4.2454
5.1803
5.8983
7.5035
9.7993
12.2605
14.3121
15.5117
16.1217
17.4652
19.6122
As a check, you can see that my guess of 2.5 is not too far off.
댓글 수: 2
David Wilson
2019년 4월 18일
Following my way, you don't need to adjust the stepsize since integral will (magically) take care of it using its adaptive step size ability. I didn't bother add any tolerance to integral, since 2 decimal places is pretty lax.
HOWEVER, you were asked to use a simple integrator without error control, so you will have to choose a suitable stepsize when using Simpson's etc. If you are going to use a straight-forward approach, I'd subdivied the interval (in t) to say about 100 steps as a first approximation.
추가 답변 (0개)
참고 항목
카테고리
Help Center 및 File Exchange에서 Numerical Integration and Differential Equations에 대해 자세히 알아보기
제품
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!