What is the reasoning behind the fact that min(0,NaN) is 0?
조회 수: 11 (최근 30일)
이전 댓글 표시
I know that Mathworks pays a lot of attention to this stuff, so I am wondering why the expression
>> min(0,NaN)
is 0. Returning a NaN here seems more logical to me.
댓글 수: 4
Bryan
2020년 4월 25일
편집: Bryan
2020년 4월 25일
yes i noticed that very quickly (hence deleted that bit of the post). but you were in there very quick with helpful feedback, thanks for the explanation.
As a small bit of feedback, perhaps the min() documentation could mention in the very first line of the documentation that NaN values will be ignored by default, since this is unusal behaviour in the Matlab environment. The documentation here: https://se.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/min.html and in 'help min' states
M = min(X) is the smallest element in the vector X.
perhaps it could state
M = min(X) is the smallest non-NaN element in the vector X.
or alternatively
M = min(X) is the smallest element in the vector X, whereby NaN elements are ignored by default.
cheers
Stephen23
2020년 4월 25일
편집: Stephen23
2020년 4월 26일
@Bryan: you should make that as an enhancement request.
Another option is to stop relying on inconsistent "default" behavior and always specify any flags, dimensions, etc. for any function that has these kind of options. Although it requires a little more typing, it has the following advantages:
- makes the intention clear
- avoids bugs, e.g. when a matrix ony has one row (and thus min returns a scalar, not a row vector)
- throws an error on versions that do not support that option, rather than silently continuing...
답변 (5개)
Walter Roberson
2012년 5월 21일
If you initialize the result to inf, and then loop testing whether the current value is less than the result and replace the result if it is, then since NaN < any number is false, the result will never get replaced with NaN. You would have to add special code to return NaN in such a case.
댓글 수: 0
Sean de Wolski
2012년 5월 21일
댓글 수: 2
Jan
2012년 5월 22일
It depends on how you understand the MIN function. 0 < NaN replies FALSE, but NaN < 0 replies FALSE also. As long as it is well documented, both values are reasonable.
Daniel Shub
2012년 5월 22일
Given the behavior of MIN, I find it odd that there is a NANMIN function.
댓글 수: 2
Jonathan Sullivan
2012년 6월 21일
That is really interesting. If you look inside nanmin, it has one line.:
[varargout{1:nargout}] = min(varargin{:});
per isakson
2012년 6월 21일
MIN and MAX ignores NaN. MEAN and SUM does not. I guess NANMIN (in stat toolbox) is for people like me who cannot remember all the details when we cannot see the underlying logic.
M Sohrabinia
2012년 6월 21일
NaN is considered undefined, so undefined is ignored by most functions (0/0 will be resulted in NaN which is basically undefined but any number divided by 0, say 4/0, will result in inf). However, the question is why Matlab has decided to treat NaNs in a certain way in some functions, e.g., sort function will always arrange NaNs at the top end (A to Z mode). I guess Matlab has just decided to adopt some rules to handle exceptions.
댓글 수: 0
Mark vanRossum
2021년 6월 3일
I encountered this when working on arrays.
x=[1 NaN 10];
y=[5 5 5];
m=min(x,y) and m=nanmin(x,y) return [1,5,5]
In V2020, min(x,y,'includenan') returns [1, NaN,5]
Here is an ugly workaround to get the desired behaviour in older versions.
q=isnan(x)
m=min(x,y)
m(q)=NaN
댓글 수: 0
참고 항목
카테고리
Help Center 및 File Exchange에서 Logical에 대해 자세히 알아보기
제품
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!