least square method with multible unkonwn

조회 수: 2(최근 30일)
Rolfe
Rolfe 2022년 8월 2일
댓글: William Rose 2022년 8월 4일
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to fit some equations to data. As I am quite new to Matlab and coding in general, I am having a hard time achieving this.
Maybe you can help me out with my problem.
I got data from three 3-axis-accelerometers and I am trying to get the angular velocity/acceleration.
The vehicle was not moving during testing, therfore it should be feasible to say that the global coordinate system is equal to the local coordinate system. If errors are very high at the end, I might have to change this.
The measured data looks like this:
%Time Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration
%s m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2
% CylHead2x CylHead2y CylHead2z CylHead1x CylHead1y CylHead1z MAGx MAGy MAGz
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2,08333E-05 6,33128E-08 -4,59763E-08 2,73223E-08 -5,05531E-08 -2,49645E-08 -4,32718E-08 -4,84728E-08 -6,31047E-09 -3,13443E-08
4,16667E-05 5,5274E-07 -3,48914E-07 2,55787E-07 -5,98569E-09 -7,69206E-08 -1,61455E-07 -3,42487E-07 7,88509E-09 -3,88854E-07
0,0000625 2,44903E-06 -1,14245E-06 1,06341E-06 1,79757E-06 -2,49593E-07 -3,15895E-07 -1,34916E-06 1,37689E-07 -1,90947E-06
8,33333E-05 7,35567E-06 -2,01004E-06 2,81663E-06 9,60767E-06 5,01715E-07 5,32651E-07 -3,46298E-06 3,39389E-07 -5,71277E-06
0,000104167 1,71466E-05 -1,31856E-06 5,2826E-06 2,83488E-05 2,21753E-06 8,64681E-06 -6,71597E-06 3,42216E-07 -1,23976E-05
0,000125 3,42688E-05 2,97117E-06 6,73722E-06 5,97391E-05 2,41451E-06 3,5692E-05 -1,2059E-05 2,0028E-07 -2,10872E-05
%...
First I read the data which worked fine:
filename = 'a.xlsx';
sheet = 1;
xlRange = 'A4:J10000';
A = xlsread(filename,sheet,xlRange);
time = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','A4:A50');
cyl1x = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','E4:E50');
cyl1y = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','F4:F50');
cyl1z = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','G4:G50');
cyl2x = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','B4:B50');
cyl2y = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','C4:C50');
cyl2z = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','D4:D50');
MAGx = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','H4:H50');
MAGy = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','I4:I50');
MAGz = readvars('a.xlsx','sheet','Sheet1','Range','J4:J50');
%distance from accelerometers to CoG
r_z1 = [ 27 268 39]; % Cyl 1
r_z2 = [ 58 -260 39]; % Cyl 2
r_MAG= [ -279 -58 27]; % MAG
Next I tried to get solutions for the following dependend equations in the least square sense:
Unknown: wp = angular acceleration[edited], w = angular velocity
cyl1x = cyl2x+wpy(r_z1(3)-r_z2(3))-wpz*(r_z1(2)-r_z2(2))+wx*(wy*(r_z1(2)-r_z2(2))+wz*(r_z1(3)-r_z2(3)))-(wy^2+wz^2)*(r_z1(1)-r_z2(1));
cyl1y = MAGy+wpz(r_z1(1)-r_MAG(1))-wpx*(r_z1(3)-r_MAG(3))+wy*(wx*(r_z1(1)-r_MAG(1))+wz*(r_z1(3)-r_MAG(3)))-(wx^2+wz^2)*(r_z1(2)-r_MAG(2));
cyl1z = cyl2z+wpx(r_z1(2)-r_z2(2))-wpy*(r_z1(1)-r_z2(1))+wz*(wx*(r_z1(1)-r_z2(1))+wy*(r_z1(2)-r_z2(2)))-(wx^2+wy^2)*(r_z1(3)-r_z2(3));
I tried to solve this with a time loop and linear least square method. Unfortunatly I am having a hard time getting anything usefull here. If you can give me a hint how to do this right I would be really greatful.
Best regards, Rolfe
  댓글 수: 7
Torsten
Torsten 2022년 8월 2일
It's not a MATLAB question.
It's a question on how usually wx(i), wy(i) and wz(i) are approximated as functions of w.x(i),w.y(i), w.z(i) and maybe w.x(i-1),w.y(i-1), w.z(i-1),w.x(i+1),w.y(i+1), w.z(i+1).

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

답변(1개)

William Rose
William Rose 2022년 8월 2일
@Rolfe, I will look at this later this week, if you do not have an answer by then.
Below is a part of an analysis I did related to soccer heading data. I have to think about this more. I will have time later this week.
We will assume that the center of mass is point A, and we will assume that the linear acceleration of the center of mass is zero: . In the equaiton below, we will use B=B1, B2, B3 for the 2 cylinders and the magneto respectively. We will try to find values for ω and that minimize the sum squared error between the estimated and measured linear accelearations at the three points.
I hope the solution does not involve a Kalman filter. I never mastered Kalman filters.
  1. Angular velocity estimation based on adaptive simplified spherical simplex unscented Kalman filter in GFSINS
  2. Kalman Filter estimation of angular acceleration https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/916/1/012072/pdf
----------------
All points on a rigid body experience the same angular velocity and angular acceleration at each time point. Let A and B be two points on a rigid body. The linear acceleration at point B is related to the movement at point A by
where
= linear accelerations at points A and B
ω = angular velocity (same everywhere, so it is not indexed by A or B)
α = dω/dt = angular acceleration (same everywhere, so it is not indexed by A or B)
= vector pointing to B from A.
Sources: “Chapter 15 Kinematics of Rigid Bodies”, retrieved 2016-01-27 from here, see equation near top of p.23. Whiteman, W, “Planar (2D) Rigid Body Kinematics I”, retrieved 2016-01-27 from here, see time 2:40. Shaprio, J, “Chapter 4 Rigid Body Motion”, retrieved 20160128 from here; see equation at bottom of p.12; this equation includes two extra terms which drop out, since, for a rigid body, the intra-body velocity db/dt and acceleration are 0.
  댓글 수: 4
William Rose
William Rose 2022년 8월 4일
@Rolfe, thank you. See email.

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by