This example shows how to simulate electricity prices using a mean-reverting model with seasonality and a jump component. The model is calibrated under the real-world probability using historical electricity prices. The market price of risk is obtained from futures prices. A risk-neutral Monte Carlo simulation is conducted using the calibrated model and the market price of risk. The simulation results are used to price a Bermudan option with electricity prices as the underlying.
Electricity prices exhibit jumps in prices at periods of high demand when additional, less efficient electricity generation methods, are brought on-line to provide a sufficient supply of electricity. In addition, they have a prominent seasonal component, along with reversion to mean levels. Therefore, these characteristics should be incorporated into a model of electricity prices .
In this example, electricity price is modeled as:
where is the spot price of electricity. The logarithm of electricity price is modeled with two components: and . The component is the deterministic seasonal part of the model, and is the stochastic part of the model. Trigonometric functions are used to model as follows :
where are constant parameters, and is the annualized time factors. The stochastic component is modeled as an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process (mean-reverting) with jumps:
The parameters and are the mean-reversion parameters. Parameter is the volatility, and is a standard Brownian motion. The jump size is , with a normally distributed mean , and a standard deviation . The Poisson process has a jump intensity of .
Sample electricity prices from January 1, 2010 to November 11, 2013 are loaded and plotted below.
Prices contain the electricity prices, and
PriceDates contain the dates associated with the prices. The logarithm of the prices and annual time factors are calculated.
% Load electricity prices and futures prices load('electricity_prices.mat'); % Plot electricity prices figure; plot(PriceDates, Prices); datetick(); title('Electricity Prices'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('Price ($)');
% Obtain log of prices logPrices = log(Prices); % Obtain annual time factors from dates PriceTimes = yearfrac(PriceDates(1), PriceDates);
First, the deterministic seasonality part is calibrated using the least squares method. Since the seasonality function is linear with respect to the parameters , the backslash operator (
mldivide) is used. After the calibration, the seasonality is removed from the logarithm of price. The logarithm of price and seasonality trends are plotted below. Also, the de-seasonalized logarithm of price is plotted.
% Calibrate parameters for the seasonality model seasonMatrix = @(t) [sin(2.*pi.*t) cos(2.*pi.*t) sin(4.*pi.*t) ... cos(4.*pi.*t) t ones(size(t, 1), 1)]; C = seasonMatrix(PriceTimes); seasonParam = C\logPrices; % Plot log price and seasonality line figure; subplot(2, 1, 1); plot(PriceDates, logPrices); datetick(); title('log(price) and Seasonality'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('log(Prices)'); hold on; plot(PriceDates, C*seasonParam, 'r'); hold off; legend('log(Price)', 'seasonality'); % Plot de-seasonalized log price X = logPrices-C*seasonParam; subplot(2, 1, 2); plot(PriceDates, X); datetick(); title('log(price) with Seasonality Removed'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('log(Prices)');
The second stage is to calibrate the stochastic part. The model for needs to be discretized to conduct the calibration. To discretize, assume that there is a Bernoulli process for the jump events. That is, there is at most one jump per day since this example is calibrating against daily electricity prices. The discretized equation is:
with probability and,
with probability , where and are independent standard normal random variables, and . The density function of given is [1,4]:
The parameters can be calibrated by minimizing the negative log likelihood function:
The first inequality constraint, , is equivalent to . The volatilities and must be positive. In the last inequality, is between 0 and 1, because it represents the probability of a jump occurring in time. In this example, assume that is one day. Therefore, there is at most 365 jumps in one year. The
mle function from the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox™ is well suited to solve the above maximum likelihood problem.
% Prices at t, X(t) Pt = X(2:end); % Prices at t-1, X(t-1) Pt_1 = X(1:end-1); % Discretization for daily prices dt = 1/365; % PDF for discretized model mrjpdf = @(Pt, a, phi, mu_J, sigmaSq, sigmaSq_J, lambda) ... lambda.*exp((-(Pt-a-phi.*Pt_1-mu_J).^2)./ ... (2.*(sigmaSq+sigmaSq_J))).* (1/sqrt(2.*pi.*(sigmaSq+sigmaSq_J))) + ... (1-lambda).*exp((-(Pt-a-phi.*Pt_1).^2)/(2.*sigmaSq)).* ... (1/sqrt(2.*pi.*sigmaSq)); % Constraints: % phi < 1 (k > 0) % sigmaSq > 0 % sigmaSq_J > 0 % 0 <= lambda <= 1 lb = [-Inf -Inf -Inf 0 0 0]; ub = [Inf 1 Inf Inf Inf 1]; % Initial values x0 = [0 0 0 var(X) var(X) 0.5]; % Solve maximum likelihood params = mle(Pt,'pdf',mrjpdf,'start',x0,'lowerbound',lb,'upperbound',ub,... 'optimfun','fmincon'); % Obtain calibrated parameters alpha = params(1)/dt
alpha = -20.1060
kappa = (1-params(2))/dt
kappa = 188.2535
mu_J = params(3)
mu_J = 0.2044
sigma = sqrt(params(4)/dt); sigma_J = sqrt(params(5))
sigma_J = 0.2659
lambda = params(6)/dt
lambda = 98.3357
The calibrated parameters and the discretized model allow us to simulate electricity prices under the real-world probability. The simulation is conducted for approximately 2 years with 10,000 trials. It exceeds 2 years to include all the dates in the last month of simulation. This is because the expected simulation prices for the futures contract expiry date is required in the next section to calculate the market price of risk. The seasonality is added back on the simulated paths. A plot for a single simulation path is plotted below.
rng default; % Simulate for about 2 years nPeriods = 365*2+20; nTrials = 10000; n1 = randn(nPeriods,nTrials); n2 = randn(nPeriods, nTrials); j = binornd(1, lambda*dt, nPeriods, nTrials); SimPrices = zeros(nPeriods, nTrials); SimPrices(1,:) = X(end); for i=2:nPeriods SimPrices(i,:) = alpha*dt + (1-kappa*dt)*SimPrices(i-1,:) + ... sigma*sqrt(dt)*n1(i,:) + j(i,:).*(mu_J+sigma_J*n2(i,:)); end % Add back seasonality SimPriceDates = daysadd(PriceDates(end),0:nPeriods-1); SimPriceTimes = yearfrac(PriceDates(1), SimPriceDates); CSim = seasonMatrix(SimPriceTimes); logSimPrices = SimPrices + repmat(CSim*seasonParam,1,nTrials); % Plot logarithm of Prices and simulated logarithm of Prices figure; subplot(2, 1, 1); plot(PriceDates, logPrices); hold on; plot(SimPriceDates(2:end), logSimPrices(2:end,1), 'red'); seasonLine = seasonMatrix([PriceTimes; SimPriceTimes(2:end)])*seasonParam; plot([PriceDates; SimPriceDates(2:end)], seasonLine, 'green'); hold off; datetick(); title('Actual log(price) and Simulated log(price)'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('log(price)'); legend('market', 'simulation'); % Plot prices and simulated prices PricesSim = exp(logSimPrices); subplot(2, 1, 2); plot(PriceDates, Prices); hold on; plot(SimPriceDates, PricesSim(:,1), 'red'); hold off; datetick(); title('Actual Prices and Simulated Prices'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('Price ($)'); legend('market', 'simulation');
Up to this point, the parameters were calibrated under the real-world probability. However, to price options, you need the simulation under the risk-neutral probability. To obtain this, calculate the market price of risk from futures prices to derive the risk-neutral parameters. Suppose that there are monthly futures contracts available on the market, which are settled daily during the contract month. For example, such futures for the PJM electricity market are listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange .
The futures are settled daily during the contract month. Therefore, you can obtain daily futures values by assuming the futures value is constant for the contract month. The expected futures prices from the real-world measure are also needed to calculate the market price of risk. This can be obtained from the simulation conducted in the previous section.
% Obtain daily futures prices FutPricesDaily = zeros(size(SimPriceDates)); for i=1:nPeriods idx = find(year(SimPriceDates(i)) == year(FutExpiry) & ... month(SimPriceDates(i)) == month(FutExpiry)); FutPricesDaily(i) = FutPrices(idx); end % Calculate expected futures price under real-world measure SimPricesExp = mean(PricesSim, 2);
To calibrate the market price of risk against market futures values, use the following equation:
where is the observed futures value at time , and is the expected value under the real-world measure at time . The equation was obtained using the same methodology as described in . This example assumes that the market price of risk is fully driven by the Brownian motion. The market price of risk, , can be solved by discretizing the above equation and solving a system of linear equations.
% Setup system of equations t0 = yearfrac(PriceDates(1), FutValuationDate); tz = SimPriceTimes-t0; b = -log(FutPricesDaily(2:end) ./ SimPricesExp(2:end)) ./ ... (sigma.*exp(-kappa.*tz(2:end))); A = (1/kappa).*(exp(kappa.*tz(2:end)) - exp(kappa.*tz(1:end-1))); A = tril(repmat(A', size(A,1), 1)); % Precondition to stabilize numerical inversion P = diag(1./diag(A)); b = P*b; A = P*A; % Solve for market price of risk riskPremium = A\b;
Once is obtained, risk-neutral simulation can be conducted using the following dynamics:
with probability and
with probability .
nTrials = 10000; n1 = randn(nPeriods, nTrials); n2 = randn(nPeriods, nTrials); j = binornd(1, lambda*dt, nPeriods, nTrials); SimPrices = zeros(nPeriods, nTrials); SimPrices(1,:) = X(end); for i=2:nPeriods SimPrices(i,:) = alpha*dt + (1-kappa*dt)*SimPrices(i-1,:) + ... sigma*sqrt(dt)*n1(i,:) - sigma*dt*riskPremium(i-1) + ... j(i,:).*(mu_J+sigma_J*n2(i,:)); end % Add back seasonality CSim = seasonMatrix(SimPriceTimes); logSimPrices = SimPrices + repmat(CSim*seasonParam,1,nTrials); % Convert log(Price) to Price PricesSim = exp(logSimPrices);
The expected values from the risk-neutral simulation are plotted against the market futures values. This confirms that the risk-neutral simulation closely reproduces the market futures values.
% Obtain expected values from the risk-neutral simulation SimPricesExp = mean(PricesSim,2); fexp = zeros(size(FutExpiry)); for i = 1:size(FutExpiry,1) idx = SimPriceDates == FutExpiry(i); if sum(idx)==1 fexp(i) = SimPricesExp(idx); end end % Plot expected values from the simulation against market futures prices figure; subplot(2,1,1); plot(FutExpiry, FutPrices(1:size(FutExpiry,1)),'-*'); hold on; plot(FutExpiry, fexp, '*r'); datetick(); hold off; title('Market Futures Prices and Simulated Futures Prices'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('Price'); legend('market', 'simulation', 'Location', 'NorthWest'); subplot(2,1,2); plot(SimPriceDates(2:end), riskPremium); datetick(); title('Market Price of Risk'); xlabel('Date'); ylabel('Market Price of Risk');
The risk-neutral simulated values are used as input into the function
optpricebysim in the Financial Instruments Toolbox™ to price a European, Bermudan, or American option on electricity prices. Below, the price is calculated for a two-year Bermudan call option with two exercise opportunities. The first exercise is after one year, and the second is at the maturity of the option.
% Settle, maturity of option Settle = FutValuationDate; Maturity = addtodate(FutValuationDate, 2, 'year'); % Create interest rate term structure riskFreeRate = 0.01; Basis = 0; Compounding = -1; RateSpec = intenvset('ValuationDate', Settle, 'StartDates', Settle, ... 'EndDates', Maturity, 'Rate', riskFreeRate, 'Compounding', ... Compounding, 'Basis', Basis); % Cutoff simulation at maturity endIdx = find(SimPriceDates == Maturity); SimPrices = PricesSim(1:endIdx,:); Times = SimPriceTimes(1:endIdx) - SimPriceTimes(1); % Bermudan call option with strike 60, two exercise opportunities, after % one year and at maturity. OptSpec = 'call'; Strike = 60; ExerciseTimes = [Times(366) Times(end)]; Price = optpricebysim(RateSpec, SimPrices, Times, OptSpec, Strike, ... ExerciseTimes)
Price = 1.1085
 Escribano, Alvaro, Pena, Juan Ignacio, Villaplana, Pablo. "Modeling Electricity Prices: International Evidence." Universidad Carloes III de Madrid, Working Paper 02-27, 2002.
 Lucia, Julio J., Schwartz, Eduaro. "Electricity Prices and Power Derivatives: Evidence from the Nordic Power Exchange." Review of Derivatives Research. Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp 5-50, 2002.
 Seifert, Jan, Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese. "Modelling Jumps in Electricity Prices: Theory and Empirical Evidence." Review of Derivatives Research. Vol. 10, pp 59-85, 2007.
 Villaplana, Pablo. "Pricing Power Derivatives: A Two-Factor Jump-Diffusion Approach." Universidad Carloes III de Madrid, Working Paper 03-18, 2003.