Solution Stats
Problem Comments
-
8 Comments
Show
5 older comments
Jean-Marie Sainthillier
on 2 Aug 2012
Tests aren't specifically adapted to this problem. The code for problem 67 (Find common elements in matrix works here).
Sergey
on 7 Aug 2012
Absolutely agree with Jean-Marie.
Tests is not good enough.
Marlies
on 4 Dec 2012
Not sure if the previous commenters have the same issue that I have, but I dislike that this test-suite makes a difference in how the empty-matrix is defined (See also comments for solution 167825).
I would suggest checking isempty' for the relevant solutions.
Heather
on 5 Sep 2013
Ironically, simply including the example from the problem statement in the test suite would reject the current smallest ("best") solutions.
Peter
on 18 Nov 2014
Indeed, the current leading solutions with size 29 yield only elements that exist in ALL of the rows in the matrix!
Simon Thomas
on 20 Nov 2017
This needs another test case.
Many would fail this:
%%
x = [1 1 1 1;2 3 4 5;3 6 7 8];
y_correct = [3];
assert(isequal(common_by_row(x),y_correct))
arsenic 陈
on 10 May 2021
https://blog.csdn.net/qq_44846756/article/details/116567963
i thought different
Dyuman Joshi
on 25 Aug 2021
The test suit has been updated to check for miscellaneous cases and a reference solution is added.
Solution Comments
-
1 Comment
Paresh yeole
on 5 Dec 2019
I know I have adapted code according to test cases. But was stuck in this one.
-
2 Comments
Daniel Pereira
on 20 Nov 2015
Don't know why an empty matrix 1-by-0 is not equal to the empty matrix [].
Jan Orwat
on 20 Nov 2015
[] is 0-by-0. mtimes(ones(1,0), ones(0,1)) equals 0, mtimes([], ones(0,1)) is empty 0-by-1. This is one of the reasons.
-
1 Comment
Pascal Geschwill
on 28 Apr 2014
I used exactly the same code as for problem 67.
-
1 Comment
Ze Zhang
on 17 Mar 2015
Nice! But I think you made a mistake in if length(m)==size(x,1), according to the instruction, a number that appears more than half of total rows would be okay.
-
1 Comment
arsenic 陈
on 11 May 2021
when x = [1 1 1 1;2 3 4 5;3 6 7 8] it not work
-
2 Comments
Marlies
on 25 Nov 2012
My solution fails on the magic, the wilkonson and the [1;2] inputs.
However, on my own computer each input works as expected.
Anyone has a hint on where I am going wrong?
Marlies
on 4 Dec 2012
Found it.
Due to the way the test-suite is set-up (using 'isequal'), MATLAB makes a difference between the values "[]" (size [0 0]) and "Empty matrix: 1-by-0" (size [1 0]), even though they are both considered empty.
Problem Recent Solvers1013
Suggested Problems
-
153 Solvers
-
Find the sum of the elements in the "second" diagonal
1031 Solvers
-
Matrix with different incremental runs
283 Solvers
-
Number of digits in an integer
363 Solvers
-
Area of an equilateral triangle
3498 Solvers
More from this Author95
Problem Tags
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!
Select a Web Site
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
Select web siteYou can also select a web site from the following list:
Americas
- América Latina (Español)
- Canada (English)
- United States (English)
Europe
- Belgium (English)
- Denmark (English)
- Deutschland (Deutsch)
- España (Español)
- Finland (English)
- France (Français)
- Ireland (English)
- Italia (Italiano)
- Luxembourg (English)
- Netherlands (English)
- Norway (English)
- Österreich (Deutsch)
- Portugal (English)
- Sweden (English)
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom (English)