Hello all,
I made the following example:
typedef unsigned int U16;
typedef unsigned char U8;
// case 1;
U16 a = 0x0FFF;
U16 b = 0x0E00;
U8 c = 0x00;
//case 2:
U16 d = 0xFFFF;
U16 e = 0x0011;
U16 f = 0;
void main()
{ //case 1:
c = (U8) (a-b); // -> red check overflow
//case 2:
f = (U8) ((d + e)&0x00FF); // + red warning -> no effect of 0x00FF
}
When I run the Polyspace (Code Prover R2014b) analysis, I receive the following red checks:
1) Error: operation [conversion from unsigned int16 to unsigned int8] on scalar overflows (result is always strictly greater than MAX UINT8) conversion from unsigned int 16 to unsigned int 8
2) Error: operation [+] on scalar overflows (result is always strictly greater than MAX UINT16) operator + on type unsigned int 16
If I change the code from:
c = (U8) (a-b);
to
c = (U8) ((a-b)&0x00FF);
I don't receive the first red warning. Which is the correct configuration for overflow for no error occurring?

댓글 수: 1

Hi Christina,
is your question answered with the answers of Alex and myself?
Titus

댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.

 채택된 답변

Alexandre De Barros
Alexandre De Barros 2015년 4월 13일
편집: MathWorks Support Team 2023년 1월 10일

0 개 추천

Hi,
I will also add that Polyspace is raising an overflow here because in your Polyspace project, you have specified an option to detect overflows on unsigned (see Check Behavior). For more information, see: https://www.mathworks.com/help/codeprover/ref/overflowmodeforunsignedintegerunsignedintegeroverflows.html.
The C standard says that there is no overflow on unsigned types (a wrap-around is taking place if that happens), but Polyspace can be stricter than the ANSI C standard.
So if you want to get rid of this overflow on unsigned, you have to use the default mode for detecting overflow (signed only).
Best regards,
Alexandre

추가 답변 (1개)

Titus Edelhofer
Titus Edelhofer 2015년 4월 10일
편집: Titus Edelhofer 2015년 4월 10일

1 개 추천

Hi,
hmm, I guess the first error is explainable: you indeed have an overflow here.
hex2dec('0FFF')-hex2dec('0E00')
ans =
511
which is larger than 255. This overflows when cast to U8.
The second error is also correct: your plus operation overflows in U16. Doing the "&" afterwards does not help here, because the error occurred inside the (d+e).
last but not least:
c = (U8) ((a-b)&0x00FF);
does not error, because (a-b) is fine (it's done in U16 and a>b). The "&" "removes" the bits larger than 255. Then casting to U8 is safe.
Titus

카테고리

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by