OK, I had to test the leader's work myself, and I get it now. If any values repeat, unique()
's answer is shorter and therefore not equal. Since unique()
sorts the answer in ascending order, only a strictly increasing function has both terms equal.
can I say: WOW
Test | Status | Code Input and Output |
---|---|---|
1 | Pass |
%%
x = [0 1 2 3 4];
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),true));
|
2 | Pass |
%%
x = [0];
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),true));
|
3 | Pass |
%%
x = [0 0 0 0 0];
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),false));
|
4 | Pass |
%%
x = [0 1 2 3 -4];
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),false));
|
5 | Pass |
%%
x = [-3 -4 2 3 4];
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),false));
|
6 | Pass |
%%
x = 1:.1:10;
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),true));
|
7 | Pass |
%%
x = cumsum(rand(1,100));
x(5) = -1;
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),false));
|
8 | Pass |
%%
x = cumsum(rand(1,50));
assert(isequal(mono_increase(x),true));
|
1610 Solvers
927 Solvers
Find the sum of the elements in the "second" diagonal
879 Solvers
299 Solvers
Area of an equilateral triangle
1705 Solvers