Static optimization using fmincon and quadprog
조회 수: 1 (최근 30일)
이전 댓글 표시
Can anyone tell me which one os the optimization methods is faster between "fmincon" and "quadprog"? And why is it faster or slower?
Thanks in advance,
Raj Patel
댓글 수: 0
채택된 답변
Ameer Hamza
2020년 11월 17일
편집: Ameer Hamza
2020년 11월 17일
quadprog() is used for a very specific type of optimization problem and, therefore, can be optimized way more than fmincon(). However, note that there is no direct comparison since fmincon() can solve problems which quadprog() cannot. But for a similar problem, quadprog() will be faster. For example
H = [1 -1; -1 2];
f = [-2; -6];
A = [1 1; -1 2; 2 1];
b = [2; 2; 3];
opts1 = optimoptions('quadprog', 'Display', 'off');
opts2 = optimoptions('fmincon', 'Display', 'off');
t1 = timeit(@() quadprog(H, f, A, b, [], [], [], [], [], opts1))
t2 = timeit (@() fmincon(@(x) 1/2*x.'*H*x+f.'*x, rand(2,1), A, b, [], [], [], [], [], opts2))
Result
>> t1
t1 =
8.3352e-04
>> t2
t2 =
0.0081
>> t2/t1
ans =
9.6923
quadprog() is about 10 times faster. You can also check that both fmincon() and quadprog() give same solutions.
추가 답변 (0개)
참고 항목
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!